© 2025 WUOT

WUOT
209 Communications Building
1345 Circle Park Drive
University of Tennessee
Knoxville, TN 37996-0322
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

The tension between security and free speech on college campuses

MARY LOUISE KELLY, HOST:

The FBI has released security camera images of what they are calling a person of interest in the shooting yesterday of political activist Charlie Kirk, and they say they've recovered the rifle that may have been used. Kirk was killed during an outdoor event at Utah Valley University, which highlights the tension between security and free speech on college campuses. NPR law enforcement correspondent Martin Kaste is tracking that. And Martin, tell me a little bit more. What kind of security was there yesterday at the Charlie Kirk event?

MARTIN KASTE, BYLINE: Well, this was a big outdoor event - about 3,000 people in kind of an amphitheater-shaped space. And it's believed that the shots came - the shot - one shot - came from a rooftop overlooking that area. The university police chief said six officers were working the event. Charlie Kirk also had his own security detail there. But witnesses who were there say that the security felt minimal. For instance, some people say they got into the area without any kind of bag check.

KELLY: Is that typical on a college campus? I'm thinking especially for someone who is politically controversial, like Charlie Kirk.

KASTE: Well, that's the question I had for Richard Beary. He was a chief of police for 11 years at the University of Central Florida. And that's a big place - 70,000 students. And during his time, he had a lot of high-profile visitors, including Charlie Kirk, he told me. And he said that there's no real rule of thumb for how many officers you need for a given size of event or for other factors, such as whether to have checkpoints. And he says, really, the level of security should be a function of the known risk - of what police are hearing about potential threats, what this person has inspired in other places. And they look at what's happening elsewhere in the country, such as what happened yesterday at UVU.

RICHARD BEARY: Anytime you have this type of violence, it's a game changer. You're constantly trying to evaluate the security need versus the freedom on campus. It's a constant balancing act that police chiefs do on a daily basis. And sometimes people don't like it.

KASTE: As an example, he says, back in 2016, after the mass shooting at the Pulse nightclub there in Orlando, that they redid their whole security layout for big events and football games.

KELLY: Yeah, I want to go back to that point he made about freedom on campus. Free speech has been such a live issue on college campuses for other reasons in recent months. Could incidents like this make it less likely that campuses will invite controversial speakers?

KASTE: Well, there's no doubt that's a concern for people like Robert Shibley. He's the special counsel for campus Advocacy at FIRE. You may have heard them - that's the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression. Every year, that group does a survey of college students, and the 2025 survey just came out right before the Utah shooting. It showed a slight increase in the percentage of students who say it's acceptable to shout down certain speakers. That's at 72%. And there was an increase in how many say it's acceptable to use violence, at least in some cases, to shut down a speaker. That was up a couple of points to 34%.

ROBERT SHIBLEY: The more acceptable people see violence as being, the more likely we are to see people resort to that. And, you know, the real nightmare scenario would be sort of a tit-for-tat escalation, attempting to silence one another with political violence.

KELLY: Is there reason, Martin, to believe - is there data to support the idea that this kind of violence is trending up on college campuses?

KASTE: You know, campus security experts tell me, no. They say, if anything, things were probably worse seven or eight years ago, back during the first Trump administration when some of these alt-right provocateurs such as Milo Yiannopoulos would go to campuses and sort of provoke a big reaction. And during those years, free speech groups such as FIRE would accuse the colleges of using undefined safety concerns as an excuse to cancel or restrict those appearances. That phenomenon was sometimes called the heckler's veto. And anecdotally, security experts say now that has become a lot rarer, but after this shooting, one of them said he hopes we won't be seeing a new kind of veto when it comes to free speech - what he called the assassin's veto.

KELLY: Wow. NPR's Martin Kaste, thank you.

KASTE: You're welcome. Transcript provided by NPR, Copyright NPR.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by an NPR contractor. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Martin Kaste is a correspondent on NPR's National Desk. He covers law enforcement and privacy. He has been focused on police and use of force since before the 2014 protests in Ferguson, and that coverage led to the creation of NPR's Criminal Justice Collaborative.